Industry · Nuclear & Defence Engineering

Squad AI for Nuclear & Defence Engineering

Built for sites where the answer has to be defensible to a regulator, traceable to its evidence, and understandable to the operator on shift. Squad keeps your safety case, your archive and your compliance position in one cognitive network, and deploys air-gapped where it has to.

High-impact use cases for nuclear & defence engineering

Each one is a workflow we ship inside regulated environments. Pick a starting point. Squad is designed to extend across the rest of your evidence base.

Squad · Safety case authoring & maintenance

A vendor has revised the seismic qualification report for the secondary cooling pump. Identify every safety claim that depends on the previous report and tell me which sections of the safety case need to be revisited.

42 dependent claims · 6 SAP categories · 11 sections to revisit

Periodic Safety Review: Module C

Claim 4.2.1: Seismic resilience

The secondary cooling pump is qualified to withstand the 10⁻⁴/yr seismic event per the qualification report v3 (2021). On 2026-04-12, a revised qualification was issued; the supporting evidence chain therefore requires re-validation against the new report.[QR-2021-v3]

Squad · Engineering knowledge discovery

Have we ever seen stress-corrosion cracking in the type 304L pipework on the active effluent system? Bring me every relevant analysis, RFC and incident report.

Searched 1.4m documents · 18 relevant artefacts · 1962–2023
  • IR-1987-114 Active effluent: pipe weld failure analysis Direct match
  • TN-2004-039 Stress-corrosion review, 304L weldments Direct match
  • RFC-2011-006 Pipework material change, B-stream Related
  • OE-2019-082 External operating experience: peer plant Related
Squad · Regulatory & compliance mapping

ONR have published an updated TAG on cyber security and information assurance. Show me which of our design choices and procedures are affected and where our current safety case position sits.

8 design intent statements affected · 14 procedures · 3 gaps identified
  • TAG §4.2 C&I architecture: segregation Aligned
  • TAG §5.1 Vendor supply-chain assurance proc. Update required
  • TAG §6.3 Operator authentication: control room Aligned
  • TAG §7.4 No procedure mapped Gap identified
Squad · Digital PMO

Across the live programme, where is the schedule slipping, which design changes are pulling cost, and which supplier risks are about to land on the critical path? Cite every artefact.

12 work streams · 3 critical-path risks · 6 design changes pulling cost
  • WP-04 Containment fabrication: 11d slip vs baseline Update required
  • WP-07 Supplier S-118 ITP rework, NCR pending Gap identified
  • DC-2026-019 Design change: cost +£3.4m, schedule neutral Aligned
  • WP-12 Commissioning approach within float Aligned
Squad · Asset records & decommissioning intelligence

Build me the as-found record for Building 27. I need the modification history, the contamination position, every linked safety claim and the reasoning behind the current waste route.

1 facility · 312 linked artefacts · 4 contamination zones · 11 claims

Built for sites where the regulator is reading every word.

Sovereign by design. Air-gapped where required. Cleared people. Squad is what enterprise AI looks like when the cost of being wrong is real.

Air-gapped deployment

Run entirely inside your sovereign or classified environment. No outbound calls, no cloud dependency, no exceptions to argue with security.

Security-cleared team

UK-vetted engineers comfortable working under MoD JSPs and operating-licensee change control. We turn up to site ready.

Provenance, not paraphrase

Every output traces back to the exact paragraph, drawing or RFC it came from. No hallucination wing of the safety case.

Reads what you actually have

Microfilm scans, DWG drawings, decades of procedures, scanned memos with handwritten margins. Squad ingests the archive as it is, not as you wish it were.

Built around the engineer

Squad is a colleague to the responsible engineer, not a replacement. It explains its reasoning, escalates uncertainty and leaves the call to the person accountable.

Pilot in a quarter

A scoped, evidenced pilot on a single workflow with measurable outcomes, real users and full security review, all inside three months.

Bring Squad into the work the regulator will read.

One workflow, one site, one set of measurable outcomes. We'll scope it together and have it running inside a quarter.